Wassily Kandinsky, Phalanx Exhibition, 1901
- David Charter, Times Online, February 12, 2009 “Peter Sachs wins Battle for £4 million poster collection seized by the Nazis”
- Catherine Hickley, Bloomberg.com, February 10, 2009 “Berlin Court Rules in favor of Heir in Nazi-Looted Poster Suit”
- Bernd Naumann, German Government Press Release, March 13, 2009 (in original German)
- Bernd Naumann, German Government Press Release, March 13, 2009 (English translation)
- Kerstin Kohlenberg, Die Zeit, January 15, 2009 “Looted Art-- In the name of my father” (English translation)
- Peter Raue, Tagesspiegel, February 24, 2009 “Legal venue where there was no legal venue” (English translation)
- Gunnar Schnabel, Tagesspiegel, February 27, 2009 “Sachs Poster Collection -- Injustice remains injustice”
- Gunnar Schnabel, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 3, 2009 “Jewish Heirs are left with the law”
- Catherine Hickley, Bloomberg.com, Jan. 28, 2010 "Nazi-Looted Posters Should Stay in Berlin, Court Says"
- Museum Appeals the Court Decision Affirming Sachs's Claim, May 11, 2009 (English Translation June 29, 2009)
- "What's Another Word for Injustice?" Marilyn Henry, The Jerusalem Post, Feb. 6, 2010
- "Einstein's Dentist, Goebbels, and Me -- His Great-grand-daughter Reports" Suzanne Glass, The Times, Jan. 28, 2010
- "Eigentum ist nicht gleich Besitz" by Patrick Bahners, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Feb. 19, 2010, p. 35
- "Ownership is not Possession" (English translation of article) by Patrick Bahners in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Feb. 19, 2010, p. 35
- Press Release from Attorneys Representing Peter Sachs, Feb. 18, 2010
CASES AND RECOVERY EXPERIENCE
Germany: The Case of the Hans Sachs Poster Collection
Berlin Court Orders Posters Returned to Heir of Dr. Hans Sachs. Museum Appeals. Latest Decision Gives Sachs Title and the Museum Possession.
Peter Sachs, the heir of Dr. Hans Sachs, a dentist who began collecting posters in 1905 and formed the greatest pre-War collection of posters, won a judgment in Berlin Administrative Court in February 2009 to recover over 4,000 of the posters that for decades had been in a museum (now the Deutsches Historisches Museum) in East Berlin.
There was no dispute that the Gestapo had seized the collection in the summer of 1938 on the orders of Josef Goebbels, or that Hans Sachs, having survived the war, received some restitution for his collection from the German Government. At the time it was seized, the Sachs collection had 12,500 posters.
Peter Sachs’s earlier attempt to recover the posters in 2007 was rejected by a government panel set up to review such claims. That panel held that since Hans Sachs had received some restitution payment, his son would not be able to recover the posters even though his father had believed the collection was destroyed. Further, Hans Sachs died in the United States in 1974 and never would have been able to get information about his collection from East Germany. The court claim, however, produced a different result, returning the collection to Peter Sachs, but the museum announced in early March 2009 that it would appeal.
This provoked much discussion about procedure and forum, since the two bodies reached opposite conclusions in the Sachs case. In late January, 2010, the Berlin Court of Appeals announced its decision that Peter Sachs has good title to the posters, but paradoxically overturns the earlier decision that he may get them back from the Museum. The written version should be issued by March.